Discogs lists hundreds of distinct pressings of The Dark Side of the Moon. Not hundreds of copies — hundreds of versions. Different countries, different plants, different lacquers, different decades. The album has been remastered, remixed, repackaged, and re-released so many times that cataloguing it has become its own cottage industry. And the question nobody seems willing to answer plainly is: why?

The charitable explanation is format migration. Every time the music industry invents a new way to sell you sound, Dark Side gets dragged through the machine again. The original 1973 vinyl. The first CD pressing in 1984, harsh and tinny on those early CBS/Sony discs with their pre-emphasis problems. The 1992 remaster for the Shine On box set. The 2003 SACD and 180-gram vinyl cut by Doug Sax and Kevin Gray at AcousTech — a thirteen-hour session from the original master tape that many collectors still consider the definitive pressing. The 2011 Immersion Edition. The 2023 50th Anniversary remaster by James Guthrie, now with Dolby Atmos because apparently forty-three minutes of music required spatial audio to finally be complete.

That's seven major versions across fifty-two years, and I've skipped the Mobile Fidelity half-speed mastering from 1979, the UHQR limited edition from 1981 (5,000 numbered copies on 200-gram JVC Super Vinyl, housed in a foam-padded box like a medical instrument), and whatever picture disc or coloured vinyl variant was being sold in airport gift shops during any given decade. Each one presented as essential. Each one implying — sometimes quietly, sometimes on the sticker — that the previous version hadn't quite got it right.

The format argument holds up to a point. Moving from vinyl to CD requires a new master. Moving from stereo to 5.1 surround requires a remix. Moving from 5.1 to Atmos requires another remix. These are genuinely different processes with different sonic results, and James Guthrie — who engineered The Wall and has overseen Pink Floyd's catalogue since the early 1980s — isn't a hack. The 2003 SACD's 5.1 mix is a legitimate reinterpretation. The Atmos version reportedly uses the original multitracks and places instruments in three-dimensional space in ways that serve the music rather than showing off the format. I haven't heard it, so I'll stop there.

But format migration doesn't explain the sheer volume. It doesn't explain why the 2023 box set contains substantially less material than the 2011 Immersion box while costing nearly three times as much. It doesn't explain the 2024 clear vinyl reissue — two LPs with only one playable side each, so the UV artwork can be printed on the blank side. That's not a format improvement. That's a shelf ornament.

The real answer is simpler and more uncomfortable: Dark Side of the Moon is the safest bet in recorded music. It has sold somewhere north of forty-five million copies. It spent 937 weeks on the Billboard 200. Every reissue is guaranteed to sell because the album occupies a category beyond mere popularity — it's become a cultural default, the record people buy when they buy a turntable, the disc they reach for when demonstrating a new pair of speakers. The music is secondary to the ritual. Not because it isn't good — it's extraordinary — but because the purchasing decision has decoupled from the listening experience. People buy Dark Side the way they buy a bottle of wine for a dinner party. It's a known quantity. It cannot embarrass you.

This makes it uniquely exploitable. A record label can repackage it every five years with minor sonic tweaks and a new essay in the liner notes, and the installed base of buyers will absorb the inventory. The audiophile press will review it. Forums will debate whether the new pressing sounds warmer or brighter or more "analogue" than the last one. And none of this requires the band's active participation, which is convenient given that Roger Waters hasn't been in the same room as David Gilmour voluntarily since approximately 1985.

I own three versions. The 2003 vinyl, which sounds superb. A CD rip from the 2011 remaster, which sounds almost identical. And a 192kHz/24-bit Blu-ray extraction that I recently compared sample-by-sample against a supposedly different edition and found to be bit-for-bit the same audio with different folder names. That last discovery crystallised something for me — how much of the remaster economy runs on labelling rather than substance. A new sticker, a new anniversary number, occasionally a new mastering engineer. Sometimes genuinely different audio. Sometimes not.

The 2003 AcousTech pressing remains the one I'd recommend to anyone who asks, though the asking itself has become part of the problem. "Which version of Dark Side should I buy?" is a question that sustains an entire ecosystem of forum threads, YouTube comparisons, and Discogs archaeology. The answer should be: whichever one you already own probably sounds fine. But that answer doesn't sell records.

The album itself — the actual forty-three minutes of music that Alan Parsons engineered at Abbey Road in 1973 — hasn't changed. The cash registers have just been cleared for another run, the heartbeat fading out on "Eclipse" before looping back to the beginning. Which, if you think about it, is rather on the nose.

Sources: