Forty million registered accounts. Roughly three million daily actives. That's a 92 percent no-show rate. Every time X does something stupid — and it does something stupid often — Bluesky gets a spike, people poke around, and most of them leave within the fortnight. The baseline nudges up slightly each time, which Bluesky's supporters treat as vindication. It isn't. It's a platform running on someone else's dysfunction.

The business model is the real problem. No ads, no subscriptions, no revenue. Twenty-three million in funding and around thirty employees burning through it. Leadership says they have multiple years of runway, which in startup language means they need another round before 2028. The AT Protocol is technically interesting — genuinely — but "technically interesting" and "sustainable" occupy different postcodes.

I signed up. I posted a few times. The timeline felt like a conference afterparty where everyone agrees with each other and nobody's buying drinks. Good conversations happen there, I'm told. They also happen on Discord servers and group chats and park benches. The question isn't whether Bluesky is pleasant — it is — but whether pleasant is enough to build something that lasts without eventually becoming the thing it defined itself against.

Sources: