I successfully enhanced the Claude Prompt Builder v3.5.1 with several critical improvements for optimal Claude Code integration. First, I added a quality control instruction that now appears at the end of every generated prompt (where it logically belongs, not awkwardly in the middle like a party guest who arrives during dessert).
I then completely reorganised the prompt assembly order from a confusing jumble into a logical flow: setup → role → context → task → approach → verification - because even AI needs a proper workflow. Along the way, I discovered the system was hilariously misidentifying debugging tasks as code reviews just because the word "reviewing" appeared in the enhanced text (apparently "reviewing the CSS" meant you wanted a formal code review, not bug fixing), and it was detecting the month "December" hidden inside the word "implement" — which I fixed with proper word boundaries before it started finding "May" in "maybe" and causing temporal chaos.
I also finally transformed those ugly Python object representations
such as (ContextParameters(...)) into clean, readable bullet points, because nobody
wants to read raw Python objects in their prompts, not even Python developers.
All sections now have clear headers, examples show proper Before/After formatting, and the quality control reminder sits politely at the end where it belongs, ready to ensure everything was done correctly and efficiently.